I will only do stuff here when I have nothing better to do. So yeah.

What I like: Games, shows, music, internet, food.

What I don't like: Jerks, people who was inferior to me(lol), liberals, the mainstream media, and food I don't like.

Most of the things I will do will involve crossover with a few things(Mainly World of Warcraft), just to let you all know.

Letting you all know, I won't be able to update as much as I used too. However, that doesn't mean this is the end of my stories. I will still do my best to update as much as possible. Thank you guys for liking my stories... somehow, and I will try my best to update when I can.

Here are my thoughts and views on certain issues in the world.

Do I support gun rights? Yes.

Do I support abortion? No.

Do I support the legalization of gay marriage? No.

Do I support a travel ban from countries that have a history of terrorism or currently occupied by terrorism? Yes.

Do I hate pedophiles? Yes.

I am basically a right-leaning person when it comes to politics. I figure I would share this for people to see in case for some reason they wanted to know my stance on politics in general.

What has Trump and his Administration accomplished so far?

(This also isn't mine, but I figure I would spread this around. I'll try to get the up to date versions when I can. Make sure to remove the spaces, since I don't think full links are allowed on here.)

https: // / BcSAGmDf

I do some shippings, but I don't really take them seriously, I just do them for fun. There's too much NaLu, can you all take a break from it?

I want to talk about something about NaLu real quick. I get it that it's the most likely to become canon, whenever if we like it or not, however, shouldn't that be a good enough reason to stop doing so much Nalu? If Lucy is in a harem, then that's fine, since Natsu would be with other girls as well. However, their is too much NaLu on the internet. So please, can't you all allow the other ships to have the spotlight? There's nothing wrong with Lucy, no I like her, but there's just so much NaLu and most NaLu fans, not all of them, try to shove their ship down their throats. So please, unless it's a harem, cut back on the NaLu.

I am a christian, of course you might be wondering, then why do I make harem stuff?

Because I know I'm doing this simply for fun and entertainment. I know that people shouldn't actually have harems, and I'm sure most people who write them know that as well, so I see no harm in it. It's all for fun, and as long we don't actually do this in real life, then it's fine.

I have a question, and no I'm not going to let this go, why is it that in most pokemon crossovers that have Ash in it, they make him the most dumbest person alive? When it comes to something that's not human or doesn't look human, they think they should make Ash throw a pokeball at him/her/it and think dumbly "What's that pokemon?" when he wouldn't do that in the first place! Ash is not dumb, he doesn't throw pokeballs at things he thinks is a pokemon, and he can learn and understand the situation, but no, people think they have to make Ash dumb, and that makes me angry I tell you.

My Main Version of Fairy Tail (Sort of like an AU kind of, I don't really know):

This will explain my main version of the Fairy Tail version that will be present in most of my stories. It has crossover elements.

Characters, both good and evil, that didn't exist before are real here, and the past of Natsu and E.N.D is a bit different as well. E.N.D is a good guy here as he wants to protect everyone like Natsu. Instead of just simply being sealed away, E.N.D's soul wandered the planet for over 400 years until it entered a woman's body, making her pregnant with the demons other half, Natsu Dragneel, as E.N.D was sealed inside a part of Natsu's mind. The childhood of Natsu wasn't a very good one, only his mother Maria still cared and loved him, and it was thanks to Maria that E.N.D learned right and wrong, and saw the woman as his own mother as well. However, a mysterious force called the Black Council appeared one day, got the rest of the town to join them, and were after Natsu, knowing that he was E.N.D. However, Maria refused to give up her son, knowing that E.N.D was inside of him, but refuse to give him up.

Maria and Natsu ran from the dark forces, but Maria had no choice but to tell Natsu to run as she stayed behind to fight off the invaders, but died in the process. This of course cause both Natsu and E.N.D to break down in despair as they got away. Eventually, Igneel, who came from the Eclipse gate, found Natsu, realizing that it was E.N.D, and took him in to raise him. On that day, both Natsu and E.N.D swore that they would become stronger to protect everyone even if the world hated them, and to get vengeance on the Black Council. It wouldn't be until years later will Natsu know about E.N.D.

As the years go by, another threat that was believed to be defeated by Maria and her allies begins to rise once more. What will happen, only time will tell.

That's all for now. There are many more factors that weren't explained here, but I'm sure you get the basic idea of it.

Anti-Feminism Persuasive Speech

(I didn't make this, I figure I would spread this around. If by chance if the guy who wrote this sees this, don't worry, I'm merely spreading this around.)

Does feminism do more harm than good? We all want the best for society, we want as many people as possible to live the best possible lives. But doing so requires we look beyond our own selfish desires and consider the greater good. Feminism, by it’s very nature, looks at only one part of the equation, and as a result ends up causing more harm to society as a whole. Feminists claim they are fighting for equality, but the undeniable truth is we are not equal. Russian author Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn said it best when he wrote “Human beings are born with different capacities. If they are free, they are not equal. And if they are equal, they are not free.”

So what damage does feminism actually do?

Well one of the largest issues with feminism is that it is directly contradictory to its primary goal, which is essentially to improve the lives of women and make them happier. In a study titled “Paradox of Declining Female Happiness” conducted by the University of Pennsylvania, the research actually shows that women’s happiness has in fact been decreasing since the start of the women’s movement in the 1960s. Which happens to coincide with second-wave feminism and the women’s liberation movement. This major tenet of second and third-wave feminism, specifically the idea of sexual liberation, is an incredibly disastrous ideology. Sexual liberation essentially promotes the idea that women should freely have non-marital sex and suffer no consequences. The truth is however, aside from the fact that this greatly increases the risk of being infected with an STD, a study by the Department of Health and Human Services shows that, for women, the greater the increase in the number of non-marital sex partners, the lower the probability of personal happiness. So the idea of sexual liberation directly opposes the attempt to make women happier. Another goal of feminism is to get rid of what they label as “antiquated gender roles”. However, a survey by the insurance group LV shows that the absolute number one occupation that made women the happiest out of all possible jobs was “homemaker” or stay-at-home mom, with 87.2% of housewives saying they are very satisfied with their life. Additionally, another study by the American Sociological Association shows that married couples have more frequent and better sex when women do the stereotypically feminine household chores such as cooking, cleaning and doing the laundry and men do the more stereotypically male chores like taking out the trash and fixing the sink. With this information in mind, it is no wonder that as the voices of feminists grow louder, women’s happiness continues to decline.

But women are not the only one the only ones who suffer because of feminism.

Because of sexual liberation, non-marital sex is more prevalent now than ever. Several studies show that having just a single non-marital sexual partner before getting married drastically increases your chances of getting divorced. And the unfortunately reality is, children who are raised by single mothers suffer a whole bunch of problems throughout their lives. Kids from single-parent households are far more likely to drop out of school. They are also more likely to do drugs and go to jail than kids from a two-parent household. Kids from single-parent households are also twice as likely to commit suicide. 70% of gang members, high school dropouts, teen suicides, teen pregnancies and teen substance abusers come from single mother homes. There are a near countless number of disadvantages for kids whose parents get divorced and feminism is only making this problem worse.

Feminism harms not only women and children, but men are also worse off too.

While the success of women is hard to miss these days, what’s often not mentioned is how men are struggling more and more. Philip Zimbardo, one of the lead psychologists who conducted the Stanford prison experiment, has written a book called “The Demise of Guys”. In it he reports the modern problems that are beginning to arise for boys and men. Women are now getting more college degrees than men, while men are 30% more likely to drop out compared to women. In Canada, five boys drop out for every three girls. Girls now outperform guys at every level of education from elementary to graduate school. Guys are also starting to struggle socially now as well. There is a study that is conducted yearly of college students and their self-reported shyness. Guys are reporting ever-increasing amounts of shyness year over year. While you could easily say that women were always just smarter and more capable and they are now being given the opportunity to thrive, I think the more likely explanation is what I like to call “The Breast Cancer Effect”. “The Breast Cancer Effect” is essentially that, one cause is being given a ridiculous amount of attention such that other causes are doing worse as a result of neglect. Millions and millions of dollars are given for breast cancer research, because it’s easy to market and get people’s attention on breast cancer. Everyone likes boobs. But, as a result, other causes, like say prostate and testicular cancer receive far less attention and thus far less money. This is “The Breast Cancer Effect” and it is why men are now underperforming in school. Men and boys are being neglected as all the attention is now being directed by feminism away from men to make sure that women succeed. This is the tragedy. Women should definitely be given encouragement to succeed, but it should never be at anyone else’s expense. We should be advancing efforts to help everyone succeed more, boys and girls.

It is a large and hairy issue, and it’s not going to be solved over night. But simply taking a step back and critically analyzing the dangers of feminism will help. Feminism makes women less happy, it contributes to broken homes that set kids up for failure and it is also advancing its causes at the expense of men’s social and academic success. This is why I believe feminism is harmful to the greater good of society and it is necessary to approach things holistically, as a humanist instead of a feminist. The social critic and author Camille Paglia, who received her masters in philosophy at Yale, wrote in her book Sexual Personae: “The male orientation of classical Athens was fundamental to its success. Athens was great not despite, but because of its misogyny.” While I would not go as far as to endorse misogyny, I do think at this time in our history it’s critical that we reflect on how important the male aspect of our culture is and to realize the simple truth that we cannot survive without one another. Men need women, women need men. We need each other.

Thank you.

(Didn't make this, just showing it around. Who knows? Maybe it will change your mind.)

Follow the questions to follow each argument to its inevitable end.

QUESTION 1: Do you agree that human life (separate from any idea of rights or personhood) starts at conception?

Yes-See question 2

No: For the purpose of a clear argument I will (for the time being) separate being biologically human from any concept of personhood. In doing so it is undeniable to say that biological human life begins at conception. If you really do not believe that then I cannot help you just like I cannot argue with someone who claims the earth is flat...there is no point.

And even if you dispute my scientific claim, I can reprove the fact through metaphysics. In metaphysics there are accidental and substantial changes. Accidental changes are changes to the subject which does not change the essence of the subject. Hair for example can be bleached or colored, however the underlying essence of “hair-ness” does not change. It is still the same hair before and after the hair color was altered. The change being made to the hair does not change the overall essence of the hair. A substantial change, on the other hand, does change the essence of the subject making it something completely different than before. Thus the subject becomes a new subject.

Take the sperm and the egg. The sperm and egg alone cannot grow a fully functional human body with free will. It is not until the sperm and egg meet that a substantial change happens and a human life begins. There is no other point in the development of the human body after conception that can be proven as the substantial change other than conception itself. Birth cannot be the substantial change that grants humanness because there is no difference between a baby one second before birth and one second after birth which could prove that a substantial change had happened. The same can be said for any other arbitrary milestone of development such as first steps or age 18 or age 21. All of those are accidental changes in which the overall essence of humanness is not changed. The only point where you can point to a visible and provable substantial change is conception. The sperm and the egg are not simply the sperm and the egg after the moment of conception and thanks to modern scientific equipment; you can see it happen before your very eyes.

Therefore, it is philosophically impossible to claim that any group after conception is less than metaphysically human.

If you still disagree, there is no hope of convincing you of anything if you cannot accept scientific and metaphysical fact. Thanks for playing but you fail logic and science 101.

If yes, see question 2

QUESTION 2: Do you agree that humanness endows us with the same human rights of personhood?

Yes: Congratulations….you are pro life and defend the basic human rights of all humans regardless of size, physical/mental capabilities, age, location, independence or any other accidental feature of humanness.

Sometimes: Why is it maybe?

a) The health of the mother

If a mother will die if she does not abort or if she has health risks, you are sentencing a woman to death by trapping her?

Is that really true? I would say that it is not. An abortion especially if it is late term would take 3 days in preparation just to dilate the cervix enough for the procedure. If a woman did have complications during a pregnancy that caused her to fall ill or have an impending health risk that could or is turning deadly, would a woman really wait 3 days to have an abortion in an abortion “clinic” or would she go to the emergency room of a hospital? ……………… OF COURSE she would. Except for ectopic pregnancies, most medical problems for the mother during her pregnancy happen in the third trimester and are usually after the baby is able to be taken out of the womb by C-section and in many cases survive. And even in the case of ectopic pregnancies, you would never go to an abortion clinic to resolve that. An abortion would not change the ectopic pregnancy. For such a problem, you would have to go to a hospital where they would remove the entire fallopian tube. Also, in those medical cases where there was an issue that threatened the health of the mother, having a D&E abortion would be equally as dangerous because it would not remove the true threat to the mother and the true cause of her symptoms. Quite the contrary, having an abortion would worsen symptoms because it would exacerbate the true cause of her symptoms (which is NOT the baby in the womb but rather another issue for which pregnancy triggers the symptoms).

In cases of TRUE health risks to the mother (and I mean true health risk snot just saying “health risks” as a catch all loophole) I would use the double effect rule. What I mean by “double effect” is that the intention has to be to save the mother and NOT to directly end the life of the baby. So what does that look like? Use the example of an ectopic pregnancy. In such a case, the intention of the doctor would be to remove the philopian tube in which the newly conceived baby (fertilized egg) is attached. If the goal of the operation was to scrape out the newly conceived baby (fertilized egg itself, it would be immoral because the direct intention is to kill the newly conceived baby. The other example I would use (courtesy of Ben Shapiro) would be the pregnant woman who has cancer. In her case the intention of the course of treatment (in this case chemotherapy) is to treat the cancer…….of which an indirect result is a miscarriage. I the direct reason was to cause a miscarriage, it would not be acceptable. Now how many babies do you think are able to survive outside the womb in the known cases where a health risk happened in a pregnancy? The success rate of the hospital to save both the baby and the mother is extremely high. Most of all, complications in pregnancies are rare and many of them arise later in pregnancy. PLUS, the percentage where there is a medical complication in a pregnancy is so low in the United States that it would not even reach 1 percent. Thus by using this example as a case for not making abortion illegal is bad logic. You are using a VERY obscure exemption that does not affect the main topic because the example is so rare. Thanks for playing. Try a new path or take a logic 101 class.

b) The bodily autonomy of the mother

If the baby is biologically and metaphysically a unique and separate human being from the mother (which is scientifically and metaphysically proven), therefore, it is the killing of another human being by definition. If that is true, then how can one morally excuse the killing of another human being outside of reasonable self defense?

One way would be to claim that abortion was an act of “self defense” against an invasive baby. I will show however, why such a claim is ridiculous and philosophically/intellectually dishonest.

Any attempt to claim that the woman’s autonomy is being “violated by the presence of the baby in the womb blatantly ignores the causality of how that baby got there.

THE BABY DID NOT;

a) Suddenly or magically pop into existence. That is metaphysically impossible

Or

b) The baby did not of his/her own free will choose to enter the womb and thus violate the bodily autonomy of the mother. That is also impossible and a denial of how we know that conception and pregnancy occurs.

The mother cannot claim that her autonomy was violated when it was her own freely chosen action of having sex that that caused pregnancy. It would be like throwing a rock at a glass window and then claiming that the rock was violating your house by breaking the window. I threw the rock and that is why the rock broke the window. Such an argument denies basic causality and thus is intellectually dishonest. Thanks for playing. Try a new path or take a logic 101 class.

But what about rape? see C) rape below

c)Rape

BUT WHAT ABOUT RAPE YOU SAY?

Yes……I cannot make the same causality argument in rape because the woman was not a willing participant in the sex which caused the pregnancy. Even so…there is still a logical problem with making this objection to my argument…..

Rape only makes up 1% or less of all cases of abortion. To bring up rape as an argument for abortion when rape/incest only makes up 1% or less of all abortions is the logical fallacy of composition (aka using what is true about a http://part….in this case 1% of 60 million abortions…..in order to make the same statement about the whole……..99% of abortions that are not rape/incest related). The only way to NOT fall into the intellectually dishonest contradiction and fallacy of using the extreme minority of rape/incest in order to justify abortion as a whole is to admit that abortion cannot be justified with the autonomy argument outside of rape and incest.

So let's talk about autonomy, abortion and rape/incest

They would use the objection of the “Famous Violinist” analogy where a person finds themselves hooked up to a famous violinist (against your will) in order to save the life of said violinist. This argument highlights that regardless of whether or not it saves the life of the violinist, it violates my rights to refuse. The problem with this argument is that even though the woman was violated by the rapist, the argument is still misappropriating the violation of the rapist on the woman to the baby who is innocent regardless of how he/she was conceived. Plus, any attempt to say that the woman has a right to remove the baby (even if the intention is not to kill the baby) is like saying that I have a right to eject a stowaway in my plane after I have taken off. Yes that action alone does not directly kill the person, but if I threw that stowaway out of my plane at 30,000 feet, I would be in denial if I said that I did not know that the fall would kill him. The same goes with babies. Saying that a woman has a right to eject the baby from the womb at younger than 20-24 weeks would most assuredly kill the baby and even after 25 weeks, it is not a sure thing that a prematurely born baby would survive even with our new and updated technology in NICU wards.

A better analogy to use would “The Alpine Hut” analogy which goes something like this………..

A woman wakes up trapped in a hut in the alps. It is not the fault of the woman that she is there and it is not the choice of the woman to be there. In the hut she finds that there is a newborn who needs to be fed and cared for. In searching the house, you find that there is an ample supply of food and the woman happens to be lactating anyway. It would be wrong for the woman just to ignore the baby despite the fact that caring for the baby does not lessen her ability to survive until the police finally come and rescue her along with the baby. What person upon finding the alpine hut along with the living woman and a dead baby would not fault the woman for refusing to take care of the baby despite the fact that there was plenty of food and nursing the baby does not diminish the amount of food available for the mother? Even though the woman was violated by the rapist, the argument is still misappropriating the violation of the rapist on the woman to the baby who is innocent regardless of how he/she was conceived AND it is flawed to argue for a woman’s right to eject the baby while ignoring the death sentence that it would give much like ejecting my stowaway at 30,000 feet or the woman in the alpine hut refusing to feed the child at no person harm to herself (other than slight inconvenience). Thus the argument is logically flawed. Thanks for playing. Try a new path or take a logic 101 class.

No:

Then where does personhood begin?

a) Size, Level of Development, Environment or Dependency

The most common redefinitions for the start of personhood are the SLED (Size, Level of Development, Environment or Dependency) criteria. The problem with each criteria (as I will point out one by one), is that every criteria, which is supposed to only apply to the pre-born, ends up violating its own rule and excluding someone who is born…..thus exposing the hypocrisy and invalidity of the criterion.

I will preface an in depth look at each one by offering the lincolnian philosophical response to each one based on Lincoln’s syllogism on slavery

“You say that A is big and B is small. It is size then: The larger having the right to kill the smaller. Take care. By this rule you are to be victim to the first person you meet with a larger body than your own.

You do not mean size exactly? -You mean that born human persons are developmentally the superiors of the pre-born and therefore have the right to kill the pre-born? Take care again. By this rule you are to be victim to the first person you meet who is more developed in his mind and body than your own.

You do not mean development exactly? -You mean that born human persons have an intellect and a consciousness that is higher than the pre-born and therefor you have the right to kill the pre-born? Take care yet again. By this rule you are to be victim to the first person who has an intellect and a consciousness that is higher than your own.

You do not mean intellect or consciousness exactly? -You mean that the pre-born are not as viable because they are still dependent on the mother and the womb and therefore have the right to kill the pre-born? Take care even still. By this rule you are to be victim to the first person whose independence is higher than your own.

But you say, it is a question of a woman's choice: and if she makes it her choice, she has the right to kill her pre-born child? Very well... And if another woman can make it her choice, she has every right to kill you.”

We will start with size: The unborn is clearly smaller than a born human. It’s hard to reason how a difference in size, though, disqualifies someone from being a person. A four year-old is smaller than a fourteen year-old. Can we kill her because she’s not as big as a teenager? No, because a human being’s value is not based on their size. She’s still equally a person even though she differs in that characteristic. In the same way, the unborn is smaller than a four year-old. If we can’t kill the four-year old because she’s smaller, then we can’t kill the unborn because she’s smaller either.

Level of development: The unborn is also less developed than a born human being. How does this fact, though, disqualify the unborn from personhood? A four year-old girl can’t bear children because her reproductive system is less developed than a fourteen year-old girl. That doesn’t disqualify her from personhood. She is still as equally valuable as a child-bearing teen. The unborn is also less developed than the four year-old. Therefore, we can’t disqualify her from personhood for the same reason we can’t disqualify the four year-old. Both are merely less developed than older human beings.

Environment: The unborn is located in a different environment than a born human. How does your location, though, affect your value? Can changing your environment alter your status as a person? Where you are has no bearing on who you are. An astronaut who spacewalks in orbit is in a radically different environment than a person on the planet. No one could reasonably deny his personhood simply because he’s in a different location. Scuba divers who swim under water and spelunkers who crawl through caves are equally as valuable as humans who ride in hot-air balloons. If changing your environment can’t change your fundamental status, then being inside or outside a uterus can’t be relevant either. How could a 7-inch journey through the birth canal magically transform a value-less human into a valuable person? Nothing has changed except their location.

Degree of dependency: The unborn is dependent upon the mother’s body for nutrition and a proper environment. It’s hard to see, though, how depending upon another person disqualifies you from being a person. Newborns and toddlers still depend upon their parents to provide nutrition and a safe environment. Indeed, some third-world countries require children to be breast fed because formula is not available. Can a mother kill her newborn son because he depends on her body for nutrition? Or, imagine you alone witnessed a toddler fall into a swimming pool. Would you be justified in declaring him not valuable simply because he depended on you for his survival? Of course not! Since the unborn depends on his mother in the same way, it’s not reasonable to disqualify his value either. Notice that although toddler and teens differ from each other in the four SLED categories, we don’t disqualify toddlers from personhood. Since born and unborn humans differ in exactly the same ways, we can’t disqualify the unborn from personhood either. You could do the same for (First Breath) by asking the person if I could kill him/her when he/she is holding his/her breath...or mental ability to think/be aware by asking the person if I can kill him/her when he/she is not thinking or asleep. In each instance, I can take their definition and apply it to a born human being thus showing the weakness of the argument (or lack thereof).

But what about using birth as the criterion?

While birth does not violate its own definitions or expand beyond the definitions, birth is an arbitrary point. There is no objective change just before birth to just after birth that can be used as a significant reason to have personhood bestowed upon you that was not present before. It is no more arbitrary than using age 18 or age 21. Being such, I could easily argue that personhood begins at age 18 or 21 thus changing infanticide, homicide against children and overall child abuse legal.

In conclusion:

The problem with any claim of one group of people having a higher status/higher rights than others will ultimately end in any other group of humans being given less rights or worth...whether it is Jews, blacks, The mentally or physically disabled, the old, the young, the politically conservative or the politically liberal...OR YOU. The only way to ensure that such a scenario never happens again (BECAUSE IT DID HAPPEN IN ALL THE EXAMPLE GROUPS I GAVE), is to give ALL humans the same basic human rights and dignity (Bill of Rights?). If all are equal under the law, there can be no argument for one group being part of an “inferior class” of humans. If you truly believe that all human beings should be treated equally under the law, you would want to protect those rights for everyone regardless of size, age, gender, race/skin color, mental development, physical development or any other accidental grouping in which people get placed. That is what the founding fathers thought when they wrote the Constitution and anyone who claims to uphold the constitution and agree with the premise of the constitution cannot give some humans less rights than others without contradicting themselves. Thanks for playing. Try a new path or take a logic 101 class.

Maps that I made.(Remove the spaces in the links to go to them)

Naaru'Sha(Present in "Of Light and Shadow"): http: // / art / Map-Naaru-Sha-655097858

The Tai'Zul Isle(Present in "Our New life"): http: // / art / Map-The-Tai-Zul-Isle-655085628

Quotes

(From real people to fictional, from serious ones to funny ones.)

"I come in peace. I didn't bring artillery. But I'm pleading with you, with tears in my eyes: If you f*@k with me, I'll kill you all." - General James "Mad Dog" Mattis

"Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet." - General James "Mad Dog" Mattis

"The best troll of all is simply speaking the unvarnished truth." - Milo Yiannopoulos

"Sometimes, the hands of fate must be forced." - Illidan Stormrage

"A common mistake for beginners." - Goblin Slayer

"We could have what? You are blind Ravencrest! You are all blind! This was one invasion. They nearly killed everyone here and took Suramar. The best any of you can do is criticize my methods? My mages died saving our world. What have you given? What have you sacrificed? - Illidan Stormrage

"Without monsters, there can be no heroes." - Darion Mograine

"The fascists of the future will be called anti-fascists." - Winston Churchill

"Now I stand, the lion before the lambs... and they do not fear. They cannot fear." - Arthas Menethil, the Lich King

"You know what they say, a fish only drowns twice before the acorn falls from the apple tree." - Nixxiom

"Victory is like a tree Moocluck. It can bend, but it can also shed its leaves in the winter and drop pine cones that hurt to step on." - Nixxiom

"My destiny is my own!" - Illidan Stormrage

"Your faith has blinded you. There can be no chosen one. Only we can save ourselves." - Illidan Stormrage

"The problem in Venezuela is not that socialism has been poorly implemented, but that socialism has been faithfully implemented. From the Soviet Union to Cuba to Venezuela, wherever true socialism or communism has been adopted, it has delivered anguish and devastation and failure. Those who preach the tenets of these discredited ideologies only contribute to the continued suffering of the people who live under these cruel systems." - Donald J. Trump

"You're saying as if a family can only be made with blood relations. I do not think that is the case. A compassionate heart is what makes people a family. Blood does not help much in that regard. Love. It's love, Nanachi." - Bondrewd

“You killed me and condemned me to a worse fate! I had failed the exalted one, the great Sargeras… and as was his right as a god, he punished me most severely. I had no mouth, yet I screamed. I had no body, yet I felt pain beyond comparison. I did not blame my lord and master, however, for he only did what had to be done. No, even throughout my ordeal, I kept in my mind one thing; I remember over and over who it was that had led me to such terror.” - Xavius

"I AM DEATHWING, THE DESTROYER, THE END OF ALL THINGS, INEVITABLE, INDOMITABLE; I AM THE CATACLYSM!" - Deathwing

"The only good goblins are the ones who never come out of their stinking holes." - Goblin Slayer

“I was cast out by my comrades, exiled, forced to wander the frozen wastes. But I was not alone. Not entirely. The voice, now my only companion, guided me to my destination. Strange, nightmarish creatures awaited me at the entrance. I felt my blood run cold, as cold as Icecrown itself. Inside, I bore witness to horrific acts, demonstrations of power, power that could be mine for the asking. Terrified, I ran, but did not get far. All too soon, my choice was made. Too late did I realize that such power does not come without a price. Now, the world will pay a far greater toll, for I have returned. I am Kel'Thuzad. Your curiosity will be the death of you.” - Kel'Thuzad

"Sticks and Stones~ Can break your bones~ But words can leave irreparable mental scars that will haunt you for the rest of your life that can fester into unhealthy habits or disorders. Robbing you of who you once were and your self confidence before slowly draining the reason to live from your very existence. ...My momma had a very realistic view of life." - Grim Laugh

"Anyone can make war, but only the most courageous can make peace." - Donald J. Trump

"It's not until they tell you you're going to die soon that you realize how short life is. Time is the most valuable thing in life because it never comes back. And whenever you spend it in the arms of a loved one or alone in a prison-cell, life is what you make it. Dream big." - Stefan Karl Stafansson

"We will never surrender American sovereignty to an unelected global bureaucracy. America's governed by Americans. We reject the ideology of globalism & we embrace a doctrine of patriotism." - Donald J. Trump

"I'd rather die than withdraw. If they're gonna kill me they're gonna kill me... I'd rather die than withdraw from the process. Not for the purpose of serving on the Supreme Court, but for the purpose of not being driven out of this process. I will not be scared - I don't like bullies, I've never run from bullies. I never cry uncle and I'm not gonna cry uncle today, whether I wanna be on the Supreme Court or not." - Clarence Thomas

"A DNA test is useless to determine tribal citizenship. Current DNA tests do not even distinguish whether a person’s ancestors were indigenous to North or South America. Sovereign tribal nations set their own legal requirements for citizenship, and while DNA tests can be used to determine lineage, such as paternity to an individual, it is not evidence for tribal affliction. Using a DNA test to lay claim to any connection to the Cherokee Nation or any tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong. It makes a mockery out of DNA tests and its legitimate uses while also dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens, whose ancestors are well documented and whose heritage is proven. Senator Warren is undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage." - Cherokee Nation Secretary of State Chuck Hoskin, Jr.

"If at first you don't succeed... do it again." - King of Skill

"What country before ever existed a century and half without a rebellion? And what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure." - Thomas Jefferson

"When death arrives, will you stand and face it or kneel in defeat?" - Garrosh Hellscream

Factions of Villains that I've came up with:

The Black Council:

The Black Council is a massive group that worships the demons of the Burning Legion. Given the blood of a demon to make them more powerful, they seek to increase their ranks as well as to find a way bring their demonic masters into the world. In some stories, they play an important role in Natsu's and E.N.D's life, as they were the ones who killed their mother in the present era. Depending on the story, their origins may differ somewhat. So far, they have appeared near the end of "You are Loved Natsu Dragneel" and will appear in "Unity" and "Light's Hope".

The Night Cult:

A cult that worships the Old Gods and the void, they seek to bring all to their fold, enslave the natural forces of nature, and to usher an era of madness and suffering to the world for their masters. They are made up of people of all cultures and places, and will stop at nothing to succeed in their goals. They will appear in "Unity".

The Empire:

A massive empire that expands throughout the multiverses. With great power and technology by their side, they seek to conquer everything and to gain new weapons for their might. No matter who dares to defy them, they will stop at nothing to achieve their conquest of all creation. They will appear in "The New Age", "The Soldier", and "Battle for the Multiverse".

Future Stories I will (hopefully) do.

Fairy Tail: E.N.D: Left Behind

AU(Sort of), After the war which ended in Zeref's and Acnologia's defeat and the Book of E.N.D disappearing, everything seems to go back to normal. However, E.N.D isn't gone despite belief. Be wary in the night, for the demon who was left behind has awoken. (More on the horror side, so this story will most likely be rated M due to possible brutality and gore. No sex scenes.) Crossover elements.

PokeTail: Demons Inside Us

For reasons unknown, Fairy Tail and a few others were sent to the world of pokemon. However, secrets are revealed when the demons inside Natsu and Ash take control. Can the others save their friends, or will they bring the end of the world upon them? Ash x Serena, Natsu x Erza. Pokemon/Fairy Tail crossover with other crossover elements as well.

Fairy Tail Edolas: The Wrath of a Titan

In the Edolas world, everything was boring ever since magic was taken from them. Natsu Dragion, the Edolas version of Natsu Dragneel, was mostly affected due to no longer being able to use his vehicle and being the weakest of the Fairy Tail guild. However, one day something breaks free from inside him, and the world of Edolas will change in a way no one expected. (Has my own version of Edolas E.N.D) Edo Natsu x Edo Erza, possibly harem maybe. Crossover elements.

Fairy Tail: Born Champion

(I will work on this story once I finish the Music of Natsu and The Children of the Future) After the Grand Magic Games, Natsu was chosen to represent Fiore in the first ever Ishgar Tournament, where the chosen hero of the countries of Ishgar face each other to determine who is the best. Who will become the Champion of Ishgar? Natsu x Harem. Crossover elements.

Fairy Tail: The Vengeful Demon's Crusade

A mission went wrong, which resulted little Asuka being killed. The guild was heart broken, but Natsu blamed himself for her death. This event causes him to realized that evil must be purge, not contained, and he goes on to wipe out the dark guilds, bandits, and any that do harm to innocent people. Can Fairy Tail and others stop Natsu from going down this path? Can they even do that when people began to support and take part in Natsu's Crusade? Crossover elements.

Fairy Tail Warcraft: The Shadow of Naxxramas

Something happens that causes the heroes of the Horde and Alliance and Kel'thuzard and Naxxramas to be transported to Earthland, so Kel'thuzad decides to take this world over for the Lich King. Will the heroes of the Horde and Alliance, along with new allies such as Fairy Tail and others, be able to stop the Lich? Or will their world fall to the undead scourge? The World of Warcraft will seem OP here I will warn you. Natsu x Erza. Fairy Tail x World of Warcraft crossover.

Pokemon: His little one

When they were taking cover during a storm, Ash, Iris, and Cilan came across two unknown pokemon with a little baby girl (Who unknown to the group came from the future), who decided to call Ash her "Dada". Ash immediately begins to grow attached to the little girl. But when the time comes, will he be able to let her go? (Not too focus on the romance for this part, as the're will be a sequel to this one, but this will show a bit of a Ash x Harem.) Possible crossover elements may exists.

Fairy Tail: The World's Demons(Working title)

A discovery was made by a bunch of archaeologists, and Team Natsu and a couple of others went to help out for a mission. However, the supposedly ruins hold and contain something that may change the world as they know it. Natsu x Harem. Crossover elements exists.

Fairy Tail: E.N.D's rewriting history!

E.N.D accidentally throws himself in the past during the Alverez war after being set free. Figuring that he would help his other half Natsu and his friends out, he decides to do things to help them get stronger. He also attempts to try to keep things as original to the first timeline as possible... but he's really awful at doing that. Natsu x Harem. Good E.N.D. Some what E.N.D-focus kind of. Crossover elements exists.

Fairy Tail: His Angel, Her Demon

Natsu was removed from his guild, and as a result he went on to travel alone. One day however, he came upon Ur, who was somehow still alive, and the two went on to travel together. Eventually, Natsu and Ur fell for each other and got together. Years later, they not only started a family, but a new guild as well. How will the world, especially Fairy Tail, react to this new Natsu and the newly revived Ur? Only one way to find out. Natsu x Ur. Most likely will have OCs. Crossover elements exists

Fairy Tail: Loving Natsu(Working title)

Some differences from canon. A lot of girls love Natsu, but they also don't want each other to get him first. One thing leads to another and Natsu find himself running to not get mauled by the women in love. One thing for certain, E.N.D is going to get scarred a lot from this. Natsu x harem.

Fairy Tail: The New Age

During the war with Alvarez, nearly everyone was frozen in some stasis form due to Fairy Heart, all except for Natsu. Many years later, the stasis finally wears off, but they all find themselves waking to a world completely different than what they knew. Welcome to the new age mages of the past, for the future is now. Sci-fi! Space age! Futuristic! Good E.N.D! Crossover elements.

Pokemon: Ending the Nightmare(Working title)

Ash still remembers his past. The monsters that ruined him and many other lives before he finally escape their grasps. But the past finds a way to catch up to the present. The enemies that have brought him so much torment have returned, and plan to bring all who oppose them to their knees. But this time, Ash is not alone. The time has finally come to end the nightmare once and for all. Summary sucks I know. Crossover elements exists. Ash x Harem.

Fairy Tail: A Royal Love

Natsu's been feeling down recently, so he decides to go take a small break from the guild. At the same place he goes to he runs into Princess Hisui, whose also taking a small vacation from the palace. As buried feelings emerge from Natsu, could he finally have the love he needs from the princess? Let's find out. Summary sucks I know. Natsu x Hisui.

Fairy Tail: Her Possession(Working Title)

When Irene found him, he was broken and shattered. But yet, she couldn't help but be drawn to him. In the end though, he was hers and hers alone. No one was going to take him from her. No one. Natsu x Irene. Kind of crazy!Irene. Possible crossover elements.

Fairy Tail: The Hybrid Master(Working title)

Due to E.N.D's interference, Natsu managed to survive Tenrou Island. As despair of loosing many of his family, Natsu awakens a power within from the loss of his friends. Watch as Natsu becomes the guild master of Fairy Tail, as they make new allies, new enemies, and learn that sometimes sacrifices must be made to stop those who seek to bring them harm. Summary sucks I know. Natsu x Harem. Crossover elements exists, some include DBZ/Super.

Fairy Tail: Demon Tail

E.N.D manages to break free from his book during the seven year absence of Natsu and the others. To prove that he is better than his other half he goes on to create his own guild, to prove that they are the best and the evilest the world has ever seen... but they are really awful at doing that. Kind of crack-ish, though that word may be too strong for this.

PokeTail: Two lovable idiots(Working Title)

Natsu and a few others end up in the world of pokemon, separated from one another. What happens when Natsu, who has a demon side, meets Ash, who also has a demon side? Well they become buddies of course! Their demon sides not so much. Natsu x Harem. Ash x Harem. Pokemon x Fairy Tail crossover. Other crossover elements will be present.

Fairy Tail: I've return(Working Title)

(This is kind of a sequel to this old one shot I did called "Dreams of Home". It's kind of a crossover but I will lable it only as Fairy Tail since I think it would work better.) At the events of Tenrou Island, Natsu was believed to have died. However eight years later, he came back, with daughter as well as wilding new powers. How will everyone and the world react to this? Natsu x Harem maybe. Crossoverish.

Fairy Tail: Vengeance of Scarlet

An enemy from Natsu's past appeared during a mission that Natsu and Erza were on. Tragedy then took place as Natsu fell to this enemy, leaving Erza in despair. However, after learning more about this threat, Erza goes on her own to defeat the Black Council to avenge Natsu. But did Natsu actually die though? Natsu x Erza. Crossover elements exists. OOC kind of. AUish.

Fairy Tail: The servants of E.N.D

The Book of E.N.D didn't disappear contrary to belief. Instead, the book ended up in the hands of a far away kingdom. Wanting to know of its secrets, they attempted to open it. Instead though, they managed to unleashed many demons that E.N.D personally had created that were in the book all over the world. Now they are free and with two purposes. To find the book and body of E.N.D, and to take the world as their own. Don't know about the pairing yet. Takes place in X794, while Team Natsu are on the hundred year quest. Will be rated M to be safe. Probably will have some deaths in this.

Fairy Tail: Everything Changes(Working Title)

AU: Lady Layla stumbled upon a young four year old Natsu in the forest near her home, knowing nothing but his name. She takes him in so he can have a place to live. But how did he end up there? What are these other demons that roam the world never before heard of before? Time is set in motion as the world will soon change in order to survive, and Natsu is the center of it all. Natsu x Harem. Crossover elements exists. Summary sucks I know.

Fairy Tail: The Adventures of a Naive Demon

Four hundred years ago, the most power demon and entity of all of Earthland was put into a slumber, where many at the time would hope he remained for eternity. However, the demon was stirred when archeologists disturbed it's chambers. The demon E.N.D had awoken... and he's a child? A very happy child. A very naive child who liked to be called Natsu. Oh boy, well, let's see how the demon's new life goes. Rewrite of series. Natsu x Harem. Crossover elements exists.

My Hero of Warcraft: Against the Infinite Army

It all happened so fast. There was some mysterious activity happening at the beach, and Izuku Midoriya happened to be there to check it out. He didn't think it would send him to a planet run by powerful demons. All on his own, Deku must travel through the Twisting Nether and take arms against the Burning Legion. The question is, can he survive when he is all alone? My Hero Academia x World of Warcraft crossover.

Fairy Tail: Papa Natsu

Natsu hasn't been to the guild in a week, and this of course got everyone's attention. So Erza, Lucy, Gray, and Wendy decided to head to his house to see what is going on with Natsu. They didn't know what to expect, but it was certain that they weren't expecting Natsu having a one year old daughter. The heck did that happen? Why does Natsu have a kid? Let's find out shall we? Summary sucks I know. Don't know about the Natsu pairing yet.

Fairy Tail: Ones of Alvarez(Working Title)

AU: Natsu and E.N.D were separated from a singular being all those years ago., though that didn't stop them from knowing one another. The two demons follow Zeref to Alvarez, where they basically become royalty, or at least Natsu does. Let's see how things go when they along side a few others decide to go explore the world. Crossover elements exists. Natsu x Harem. Good!E.N.D.

My Hero Academia: For the Love of Deku

Izuku Midoriya, also known as Deku, was someone that many would tell you who was kind. He was a bit of a nerd, a bit shy, and tends to have a lack of self confidence sometimes. However without a doubt he was someone who is willing to do what is right, and will defend anyone even when his life is on the line. Kind, compassionate, a bit nerdy, nice body(at least from the girls' perspective), and cute(also from the girls' perspective), it was no surprised that he managed to worm into the hearts of everyone. More specifically the girls. And other girls outside their class. Deku x Harem. Possible crossover elements depending where the story goes.

My Hero Academia: Broken Weapon

(This is technically two stories, though I will only put in the first part summary here.) After the fight with Overhaul, a mysterious and unknown group appeared, taking both Izuku and Eri before they could recover. Now in the hands of this unusual organization, Eri will soon learn the horrors of what Izuku is being put through in order to make him into a weapon. Summary sucks I know. Most likely will have crossover elements.

Fairy Tail: The three young lovebirds(Working title)

This isn't anything to serious, just a story about Romeo, Wendy, and Chelia. As the three begins to hang out more with one another, feelings are formed. However they don't really know how what to do about this. Well, let's see how things go for them. Romeo x Wendy x Chelia, with some Natsu x Harem in the background. Might be crossover elements, depending on where I take the story.

Fairy Tail: Devils against demons(Working Title)

When Tenrou fell, everyone was it hard by it. This was no exception for little Romeo, who ran off to cry in peace. However, certain events make the young boy meeting a member of a group that decides to train him. Now, with new friends and allies, they must grow stronger and face against the true threat of the world, the demon E.N.D and his forces. Crap summary I know. Eventual Romeo x Chelia x Wendy. Crossover elements exists.

My Hero Academia: Successor of Good, Child of Evil

Quirks. Even to this day not everything is known about them. And sometimes for those who were quirkless for some, even for most parts of their lives, end up having their quirk manifest. It's always there for those who were born with them, sometimes it just takes longer for it to be brought out. Eventually, Izuku and everyone else discovers that Deku does have another quirk, but what that quirk is though causes Deku to have some serious questions. All for One!Deku. One for all!Deku. Based off the theory that All for One is Izuku's dad.

My Hero Academia: The Music of Deku

(I'm so unoriginal I know, feel free to laugh and sue me for billions if you want.) During the weekend, while Deku went to visit his mom, the others unintentionally discover something rather unusual in their classmate's dorm room. A large box of disks of music that existed long before quirks appeared to the world, and were all redone by Izuku. Watch, or read in this case, as the class, and eventually others, listen to the music that Deku revived. Summary sucks I know.

My Hero Academia: Enemy of Villainy(Working title)

While Deku's victory over Overhaul wasn't that well known or crazy to the heroes and civilians, the news of Overhauls defeat by the young hero's hand were heard throughout the villain network in Japan. Many villains seek to claim Deku's head for themselves, and will stop at nothing to defeat this new threat to them. And this is just villains in Japan! Summary sucks I know. Don't know about the Izuku pairing yet. Possible crossover elements.

My Hero Academia: Angel in Disgrace(Working title)

A group of inventors and researchers attempted to create a gateway believed to access worlds different from their own. While the portal failed, it did bring someone from the other side, the problem was that they are a genocidal maniac. Who is this new threat? Can our heroes send them back to their own world? Or will they fall to this being? Don't know about the Deku pairing yet.

Fairy Tail: Helping them move on(Working Title)

The year is X794, two years since the final defeat of the demon E.N.D, as well as two years since the wound of the world the demon left behind. Many have moved on from loosing Natsu, while a certain few still trapped with heartache. Romeo, trying to be as helpful as he can, tries his best to help the women move on. He wasn't aware of the fact that the girls he's helping were falling for him. Romeo x Harem, cause I want to do something different. Crossover elements exist, though it won't be much of it. I have problems I know.

Fairy Tail: Facing an Uncertain Future (Working Title)

Due to reasons unknown, Fairy Tail ends up in a parallel future of their world, where nearby all life was wiped out. What was the cause of this? What will happen when they see the survivors of humanity? Summary sucks I know. This idea is basically Fairy Tail meeting the characters from my short story "Final Goodbye".

Fairy Tail: The Soldier

When Igneel disappeared, Natsu tried to find his dragon as much as he could. During his search however, the young boy found something odd crash landing into the forest. Little did he know that this would be the beginning of a new chapter in both his life as well as the fate of countless worlds. But whenever that turn is a good one or not remains to be seen. Summary sucks I know. Natsu x Harem. Crossover elements exists.

My Hero Academia: The Wicked Side of Me (Working Title)

When a villain's quirk hit Izuku, it caused another Izuku to form from the original. Unknown to them all, this other Deku wouldn't be something like representing gluttony, his heroism, or any of his other good and funny traits, but a monster that will stop at nothing to spill as much blood as possible. Will be rated M for brutality and death. Don't know about the Deku pairing yet.

Fairy Tail Academia: Indestructible

Izuku has started to have dreams, dreams of a young pink haired man with demonic features with so much power that the boy didn't think it was possible to achieve such a level. He kept having these dreams and thoughts of this demonic entity... until the day the demon actually showed up. Now with two words connected and in danger, Izuku must work together with his friends and with those from Earthland if they are to stop the pink haired demon, but is it possible to defeat someone who seems indestructible? My Hero Academia x Fairy Tail Crossover with some other crossover elements. Don't know about the Izuku pairing yet. Don't know if there will be a Natsu pairing at all.

My Hero Academia: Watching the Alternate Earths

An odd artifact founded by archaeologists was brought to the heroes at U.A. High in hopes they could figure out on what it was. What they weren't expecting that it would allow them to view alternate versions of themselves and their world. So the heroes of the school, along with Class 1-A and Class 1-B plus a few others, will be having a nice view into these other alternate versions of themselves. What do these alternate timelines have to offer? Only one way to find out. Summary sucks I know. Crossover elements most likely exist.

Fairy Tail: Red, Blonde and Pink Oh My! (Working Title)

AU: For the longest time, both Erza and Lucy had feelings for Natsu, as did he had feelings for them as well. None of the three really knew what to do about it though. However, when a conflict with a new enemy takes place during a job they went on, would it be enough for them to come to terms with what they feel? Would they even survive in order to do so? Natsu x Erza x Lucy. Summary sucks I know.

Fairy Tail Academia: Heroes in Earthland (Working Title)

Due to villains who sneaked onto school grounds, Izuku and a few others found themselves stuck on another world much different from their own. Luckily Fairy Tail is there to help them out as they try to find a way home. Will they be able to find a way back? What will happen during their time here on this world? Deku x small harem. Natsu x small harem. Crossover elements exists.

Fairy Tail: A Decade Gone By (Working Title)

Based off a timeline I did from "Seeing Alternate Versions of Earthland". Natsu should have been trapped on Tenrou. He wasn't. Somehow escaping the island before it's supposed destruction, he was left behind along with the others. And instead of seven years those on Tenrou were gone... it was ten. What had happened during that time? One thing is certain, the world will never be the same again. Natsu x Harem. Crossover elements exists.

Dragon Ball Academia: Day of Fate

They rescued Bakugo and got away, allowing All Might and All for One to continue their battle without interference. However, Izuku couldn't bare to see his mentor face the evil all alone, so he bolted to join the fray. During the battle... All Might lost, he died before Izuku's eyes. The only person who believed in him... the man who helped Izuku get to where he was now, was gone. Then to the shock of everyone... something snapped within Izuku. What resulted and how it will change the world? Only one way to find out. Izuku x Harem.

Pokemon: Mayhem from the Future(Working Title)

From the future, the children of Ash Ketchum arrive scattered and lost all around the world due to an accident that took place back in their time. Will they be able to find one another and not screw anything up in the progress? Might be hard to do, considering they're all idiots in their own little ways. At least it can't get worse... right? Ash x Harem. Possible crossover elements may exists.

Some ideas for anyone that's interested if I don't do them myself.

The Story of Edolas Natsu Dragion

After the event's of Edolas's magic being taken away from them, Natsu Dragion feels completely worthless due to meeting his other more confident Earthland self. It doesn't help that most of his guild and other people always laugh at him and compare him to his other self. Wanting to improve for himself, he sets out from the city and the guild to better himself. During his journey, he finds a new land on Edolas that still possess magic, and other powers as well. A few years later, Natsu dragion returns, as the leader of the new empire of the new land. He will still keep his shy personality, but is no longer a coward and more brave. Edo Natsu Dragion x harem(Only from Edolas, no Earthland girls).

So there's that. Maybe I'll update this better in the future, so yeah.