Really don't know why I'm leaving a comment on this. Usually if I read something that I was not expecting, , as a rule, I just don't leave a comment (there were 2 exceptions to that rule, which I did regret & offered my apology to the authors).

However, I honestly don't understand this. There was no reason for a sane person to interpret what happened to the 27 who survived Canary Wharf as Jack's guilt. And, to rape Jack? Sorry, but that is actually what it was or close to it. And, to have them so casually discuss things in the aftermath of Ianto's actions & the resulting physical altercation - I do not get it. It doesn't make any sense, nothing jells in this story for me. Sorry.

So he blaimed Jack for him being the last survivor? And he figures it's Jack fault how? Jack did not have anything to do with TW One being distroyed. He just treating Jack like that because he knows Jack feels guilty and will take whatever Ianto dishes out? How is that healthy for either of them?